Case study · anonymized profile

6-Floor Apartment Block: Covering 48 Units Behind Low-E Glass

A 4,800 m² apartment block had strong outdoor signal but weak indoor coverage. The shared system used per-floor antennas without entering every unit.

South Africa · Cape TownApartments, 6 floorsView measurementsGet a Quote
Multi-storey residential apartment building

How to read this case

Anonymized representative project profile. Figures are rounded planning values from a typical site, not a client testimonial or a performance guarantee.

Profile published October 2026

Country / city

South Africa / Cape Town

Building

Apartments, 6 floors, 48 units

Covered area

4,800 m²

Envelope

Concrete frame + Low-E glazing

Operator

Vodacom, typical B1 / B3 / B7 / B38

Profile type

Deployed example

What we found

The constraint was the site, not the hardware

  • Outdoor RSRP at the roof was about −64 dBm, but living rooms and bedrooms measured −95 to −99 dBm.
  • Low-E glazing and the concrete frame attenuated the signal, and the body corporate did not want visible equipment in every unit.
  • Coverage had to include common corridors and shared areas, not only individual apartments.
  • TDD band support and 5G availability required a separate check.

Representative apartment RSRP

Before

−96 dBm

After

−82 dBm

Measured in living rooms away from windows

Every site is different. RSRP varies by operator, band, floor, wall material and antenna position. Treat these figures as a design reference, not a quote or guarantee.
Measurements

Representative test points: before and after

Representative test points with rounded values. Actual results vary with floor, walls, antenna position and operator load.

Test pointBefore RSRPAfter RSRPBefore SINRAfter SINR
Roof donor reference−64 dBm−64 dBm12 dB12 dB
Living room, floor 2−96 dBm−82 dBm2 dB16 dB
Bedroom, floor 4−99 dBm−84 dBm1 dB13 dB
Common corridor, floor 5−92 dBm−78 dBm4 dB19 dB
Basement parkingNot part of the apartment coverage target−108 dBm−93 dBm−2 dB5 dB

What changed

  • Tested apartments reached −80 to −86 dBm, with SINR of 13–19 dB.
  • Common corridors and shared areas improved to −78 dBm or better.
  • 5G performance was not guaranteed; TDD and 5G bands need a separate model and band review.

Engineering takeaways

  • Residential shared systems need early coordination with the building management and access to risers.
  • Low-E glass is a major loss source. Measure inside the actual apartments, not only in the corridor.
  • Do not promise 5G without confirming the band, TDD/FDD mode and handset support.
System configuration

Configuration used in this profile

Host1× HAG-P5-37DB five-band host
Active bandsB1 / B3 / B7; B38 TDD left for a separate review
Donor antenna1× log-periodic 700–2700 MHz on the roof
Service antennas10× ceiling antennas: one per floor plus common areas
Distribution1× 4-way + 3× 2-way splitters
Cable1/2" low-loss coaxial in existing risers

Related solution

Residential Buildings

View solution

FAQ

Common questions about this profile. To assess your own site, send the measurements.

Get a Quote

Can one system serve 48 apartments?

In this profile, one host and 10 antennas covered the tested apartments and common areas. The design relies on shared antennas rather than one antenna per unit. Final coverage depends on the floor plan and wall losses.

Will every apartment get the same signal level?

No. Position, wall construction, furniture and distance from the antenna all affect RSRP. A site test after installation is used to confirm the actual range and adjust antennas.

Does the system support 5G?

The host can be configured for selected bands, but 5G support depends on the operator band, TDD/FDD mode and the handset. Confirm the exact 5G band before ordering.

Send us your site data

Download the survey pack, record outdoor RSRP, indoor test points, building envelope and photos, then send it for a first review.